"sisters before swines" that sounds an awful lot like the fallacy "bros before hoes" You know that dosn't work right, once the right person comes along, one that you don't just wants to nail but wants to love, and you got a competitor, then this brotherhood or sisterhood becomes null and void.
I have said it before and I will say it again, this is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
It sounds a lot like it because it is a parody! Also you know what's the dumbest thing I've ever heard? Believing that gender based organizations are baaaddd because of inner competition over couples. That's being quite short minded, inmature and partially sexist? Thanks anyway, I love me some poorly based and prejudiced arguments!
I did not say that gender based organisation is bad, quite the contrary, historically almost all organisations were sorted by gender (but women were not as discriminated as most think, as there are examples of powerful female rulers throughout history even in the darkest of the middle ages there were female rulers, like Matilda of Tuscany, or Irene of Byzantium). However organisation focused on the sole pursuit of "scoring" is doomed to failure. Because while dating IS a game, the whole purpose of that game is not to just keep playing it, but to win it, and you win it, when you marry a person that you truly love and who loves you in return, and when you met that person he or she becomes absolute and every other organisation secondary.
First of all, gender based organizations are the strongest base and source of cultural, political and economical sexism and discrimination across history. Second, I was appointing that it was dumb to say that said organizations where bad not because of the sexism and lack of utility, but because stupid "competition" issues, which not only perpetuate the current sexist status quo, but adds the "Game" thing as part of the conversation. Which is double the idiotic.
Also, Marriage as "winning" the game? Who am I talking to, a priest? No offense man, but don't throw your personal prejudgement as universal facts or solid arguments. That's just pointless.